What is the context?

The speaker claims to have acted justly and asks not to be abandoned to oppressors. The plea for well-being does not remove the waiting for salvation.

Loving devotion and understanding are requested together. The refusal of others to honor God’s law makes the speaker value it above gold.

The desire for God to act is joined to continued learning. It is not a declaration that the servant can now decide every disputed matter without instruction.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley reads the older surety wording as God undertaking and pleading the servant’s cause.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?

No deeper study linked yet.