What is the context?

The Lord opens Balaam’s eyes, and he sees the drawn sword. The angel calls his way perverse and says that the donkey’s avoidance has saved his life.

Balaam acknowledges sin and offers to turn back if the journey is displeasing. He is again permitted to go only under the restriction that he speak what he is told. Repeated permission is accompanied by repeated limitation, not a blank approval of Balak’s purpose.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley connects the perverse way with Balaam’s covetousness. The angel also confronts the unjust beating of the donkey. The narrative’s reversal is concrete: Balaam has treated his preservation as an obstacle to be punished.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?

No deeper study linked yet.