What is the context?
The register turns to priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, temple servants and the descendants of Solomon’s servants. Worship in the restored community involves many different responsibilities.
Some returnees cannot establish their family’s descent from Israel. A further group claiming priestly descent cannot find the records confirming it. They are excluded from the priesthood as unclean and told not to eat the most holy food until a priest can decide the matter with the Urim and Thummim.
The restriction concerns eligibility for priestly service and its holy food. The account does not say that every family whose ancestry is uncertain is expelled from the returning community.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Henry and Gill understand the disputed priestly records as a reason to withhold priestly privileges until the matter can be settled. The careful registration protects the responsibilities attached to the priesthood. Neither the list nor its ruling describes the ancestry uncertainty as proof of the individuals’ personal wickedness.
Where does this fit in God's plan?
The question of who may serve as priest also helps bring out the distinction made in Hebrews 7:11–28. Under the earlier arrangement, descent from Levi mattered. Jesus comes from Judah, and Hebrews grounds His priesthood in God’s oath and the power of an indestructible life.
This is a connection between the earlier priesthood’s requirements and the different basis of Christ’s priesthood. Hebrews directs confidence toward the Son who lives forever and is able to save completely those who come to God through Him.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.