What is the context?
The powerful plan wrong on their beds and perform it in the morning because they can. Coveted fields, houses, and inheritances are taken from other families.
The Lord’s announced plan answers their own planning with calamity and loss. The lament about fields being allotted away reverses what they did to others.
They resist preaching that threatens disgrace, yet their conduct strips travelers, drives women from homes, and deprives children. The word they reject exposes actual harm.
The preacher they would welcome promises wine and drink. The issue is not whether a message feels hopeful but whether it tells truth and addresses the wrongdoing.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley reads the seized inheritance as harm to whole families and the pleasant false message as what the people choose to hear. His sweeping interpretation that none of their children could ever again belong to the Lord’s congregation must be read beside the explicit gathering promise in the next verses.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.