What is the context?
After the laws of offerings, Moses carries out the instructions for consecrating the priests. Aaron and his sons are washed and clothed before the gathered assembly. The sanctuary, its equipment, and Aaron are anointed for their appointed service.
The actions fulfill the earlier commands in Exodus 29:1–9. The repeated reference to what the Lord commanded keeps the appointment grounded in God’s instruction rather than Aaron’s private claim to authority. Setting someone apart here means assigning that person to God’s service.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley understands the public gathering as establishing witnesses to Aaron’s appointment. The USCCB notes emphasize the fulfillment of the earlier tabernacle instructions. The objects called Urim and Thummim are placed in the breastpiece, but this account does not explain their appearance or exactly how they functioned.
Where does this fit in God's plan?
Hebrews 5:1–10 explicitly uses Aaron’s calling to explain that priestly honor is received from God rather than seized. It then explains Christ’s appointment in the different order of Melchizedek. The connection honors the shared principle of God’s call while preserving the distinction between Aaron’s priesthood and Christ’s.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.