What is the context?
The Lord’s anger is pictured as a cloud, consuming fire, and the action of an enemy. The poem speaks with terrible directness about the loss of His protection.
Fortifications, king, priest, altar, sanctuary, and appointed feasts all fail together. The structures the people relied upon do not place them outside the announced judgment.
The measuring line serves destruction rather than construction. Broken gates and exiled rulers are followed by the absence of prophetic vision and the elders’ silent mourning.
The poem gives no easy resolution to these losses. Its images make space for disorientation before any statement of hope later in the book.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley explains the withdrawn hand as withdrawn assistance and the footstool as the temple. His reading of the vanished law concerns its reading, explanation, and observance; the line need not mean that every copy of Scripture has ceased to exist.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.