What is the context?

Samson falls in love with Delilah in the Valley of Sorek. The Philistine lords offer her eleven hundred shekels of silver each if she discovers how to overpower him. The account gives her name and location but does not identify her ethnicity, call her his wife, or describe her as a prostitute.

She asks directly how he can be bound and subdued. First he names seven fresh bowstrings, then unused ropes. She tries both while men wait in her room, and both attempts fail. Her stated purpose and repeated actions give Samson ample reason to recognize the danger.

His third answer brings his hair into the scheme: she is to weave its seven braids into a loom and fasten them with a pin. Again he breaks free. He continues supplying answers to the person arranging his capture, while she treats his refusal to reveal the truth as a wrong against her.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley calls Samson’s false answers both dishonest and foolish because they encourage a question he should have refused. Henry emphasizes his failure to learn from earlier dangers. Their shared warning concerns his continuing to expose himself to a danger that is becoming increasingly clear.

The sequence also brings the reader closer to what Samson will disclose next. Bowstrings and ropes do not explain his strength; the third attempt already involves his hair. The account has not yet described the decisive breach, but each escape is followed by another attempt rather than an end to the relationship.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?