What is the context?

Eliphaz recalls how Job’s words strengthened others and asks why he is now dismayed. He then argues that innocent people do not perish and that those who sow trouble reap it.

The images of broken lions describe the downfall of powerful wrongdoers. Placed against Job’s losses, the argument pushes him toward seeing his disaster as evidence of wrongdoing.

The reader must assess this as Eliphaz’s explanation. The opening description of Job and the statement that he has been ruined without cause prevent the argument from becoming the book’s simple answer.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley explicitly identifies Eliphaz’s reasoning as an attempt to infer secret guilt from Job’s afflictions. The USCCB note reads the lions as an image of violent sinners unable to prevail against God. An image of God judging the wicked does not establish that every sufferer is therefore wicked.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?

No deeper study linked yet.