What is the context?
Elihu describes a God who is not partial to princes and does not favor the rich over the poor, because all are His work. Power cannot hide wrongdoing or secure escape from judgment.
The cries of the afflicted are heard, and oppressive rulers can be overthrown. The speech also acknowledges that when God remains silent, human beings cannot compel Him to become visible.
The account resists treating worldly rank as a measure of worth before God. It does not establish a simple rule that every ruler’s fall or every night’s death reveals the same offense.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley emphasizes judgment upon oppression and care for those whose cries rise against it. His older wording of verse 18 asks whether one should call a king wicked, whereas the BSB describes God Himself addressing kings. The BSB’s account of divine impartiality should not become a blanket prohibition on confronting a powerful wrongdoer.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.