What is the context?
In the heavenly scene, the Lord commends Job’s integrity. Satan challenges the sincerity of devotion protected by prosperity, arguing that Job will curse God if his possessions are struck.
The Lord permits an attack on what Job has while forbidding harm to Job himself. The attacker’s power is bounded rather than independent or equal to God’s.
The question concerns whether Job fears God only for the benefit he receives. It is not the narrator saying that Job’s actual motive has been proved selfish, and Job is not told about this exchange.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley takes the court scene as a figurative presentation of God’s rule over human and demonic actions, with Satan understood as the devil. The USCCB note reads the figure in this scene as the heavenly court’s accuser and distinguishes that portrayal from the later biblical development of the devil. Both readings recognize the accusation and the limits imposed; neither makes Job privy to the scene.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.