What is the context?

The call to awake is now addressed to Jerusalem. She is pictured as a woman who has drained a cup that leaves her staggering. The cup represents the Lord’s fury, and the devastation, famine and sword describe the judgment she has experienced.

None of her children can take her hand and guide her. They have collapsed in the streets themselves. The picture makes the depth of her helplessness clear: the people who might have supported her are caught in the same disaster.

The Lord then speaks as the One who defends His people. He promises to remove the cup from her hand and put it into the hands of her tormentors. Those who treated her like a road beneath their feet will face judgment themselves.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Henry and Wesley understand the drunkenness as the effect of severe affliction, as the passage itself distinguishes it from drinking wine. The helpless children show that Jerusalem cannot supply her own deliverance.

Both emphasize the reversal: the God whose judgment she has experienced now takes up her cause. Her oppressors do not gain a permanent right to humiliate her. The promise holds together His judgment, His mercy and His defense of the afflicted.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?