What is the context?

Priests, the people, and the royal house are called to hear. Leadership has become a snare, while the Lord knows Ephraim and Israel’s defilement.

Their practices and the disposition behind them obstruct return. Pride testifies against them, and Judah is warned that it too stumbles.

They seek with flocks and herds but do not find the Lord. Bringing offerings is not a substitute for abandoning the conduct already exposed.

The final announcement concerning children, the New Moon, and the land broadens the consequence to the community’s future. The passage does not invite readers to label another person’s child illegitimate before God.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley understands the offerings as ineffective because the people remain unrepentant. His older month wording leads him to suggest Shallum’s short reign, while the BSB names the New Moon; that proposed historical identification should not replace the translation’s wording.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?

No deeper study linked yet.