What is the context?
Ezra continues mourning without food or water. A proclamation summons the exiles to Jerusalem within three days, with forfeiture of property and exclusion from the assembly threatened for failure to appear.
The people gather in the ninth month, trembling over the matter and in heavy rain. Ezra calls for confession and separation from the foreign wives. The assembly agrees, while asking for appointed hearings because many people are involved and the matter cannot be settled in one or two days.
The BSB records four men opposing the plan. Ezra and selected family heads begin examining cases on the first day of the tenth month and finish by the first day of the first month. The account describes a sustained investigation rather than a single decision made for every household in the rain.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Henry emphasizes the need for the decision to be carried out carefully. Gill likewise understands the appointed times and involvement of local elders and judges as the means of investigating the cases.
There is a difference over verse 15. Wesley understands the four named men as officials administering the matter. Gill discusses that reading but also considers the reading that they opposed it probable; this latter reading is the one used in the BSB. Either way, the narrative then moves to the named representatives and the investigation.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.