What is the context?

As the land is divided, a holy portion is set apart for the Lord. Within it are the sanctuary and open space around it, together with places for the priests’ homes. An adjacent area provides for the Levites.

The city also receives a portion belonging to the whole house of Israel. The prince’s land lies on the east and west sides of the holy district and city property.

The closing purpose is practical as well as holy: the princes must no longer oppress the people. Their own provision goes together with the rest of Israel receiving its tribal inheritance.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley explains the arrangement as portions for the sanctuary’s ministers, the city and the ruler on either side. Henry emphasizes provision for worship and ministers alongside just rule and peaceful life for the people.

The arrangement places limits on power. The prince’s position does not entitle him to absorb the people’s inheritance.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?