What is the context?
The sequence of better-than sayings commends a good name, the house of mourning, and a wise rebuke. Facing mortality can teach a living person what fleeting amusement avoids.
The contrast is not a demand never to laugh. The book also commends joy; here foolish laughter is likened to a noisy fire of thorns whose display is brief.
Extortion and bribery can corrupt wisdom. Patience is preferred to pride, and anger and idealized memories of better old days are challenged.
Wisdom has protective value, yet cannot straighten all that God allows. Prosperity and adversity both confront the reader with a future that cannot be mastered.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley reads mourning through serious reflection and the good of an end through seeing what an event actually produces. He distinguishes God’s effecting good actions from permitting and overruling bad ones in verse 13. His account should not be shortened into a claim that injustice itself becomes morally good.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.