What is the context?
The Lord commands Israel to begin taking Sihon’s territory. Moses nevertheless recounts sending an offer of peaceful passage and payment for food and water. Sihon refuses, and the account attributes his stubbornness to the Lord’s purpose in delivering him to Israel.
Sihon comes to battle and is defeated. The account includes the destruction of men, women, and children in the captured cities, while livestock and goods are taken. The conquest stops short of the territories the Lord had forbidden Israel to approach. Its severity and its limits are both stated.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley understands the Lord’s hardening as allowing Sihon to become hardened, while the BSB states the Lord made him obstinate. Wesley also treats the destruction as historical divine judgment. The USCCB notes distinguish the text’s presentation of total destruction from their historical doubt that this program was literally carried out. These are material differences of interpretation; neither should be passed off as the text’s only uncontested explanation.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.