What is the context?
Joram son of Ahab rules Israel and removes his father’s sacred pillar of Baal, but continues in the sins associated with Jeroboam. This is a partial change rather than the narrator’s approval of his worship.
When Moab’s king Mesha rebels against the tribute previously paid to Israel, Joram enlists Jehoshaphat of Judah and the king of Edom. Their seven-day march through the wilderness leaves the army and animals without water.
Joram fears the Lord has brought the three kings together to hand them over to Moab. Jehoshaphat asks for a prophet through whom they can inquire of the Lord. A servant identifies Elisha, who had served Elijah, and the kings go to him.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley distinguishes the removal of Baal’s pillar from the continuing worship condemned in the account. The USCCB notes discuss the campaign’s connection with Moabite history while recognizing difficulties of comparison. The narrative’s details should not be presented as independently confirmed in every respect by an inscription that has not been examined here.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.