What is the context?

Azariah, also called Uzziah in this chapter, rules Judah for fifty-two years. His conduct receives a favorable judgment qualified by the continuing high places.

The Lord afflicts him with leprosy, and he lives in a separate house until death. Jotham his son manages the palace and governs the people. The narrative therefore distinguishes holding the kingship from carrying out its daily responsibilities.

After Azariah dies and is buried in the City of David, Jotham succeeds him. Kings reports the affliction briefly rather than narrating its cause in detail here.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley directs readers to 2 Chronicles 26:16–23, where Uzziah’s pride, attempt to burn incense, confrontation with the priests, and resulting affliction are described. That account supplies the particular wrongdoing; it does not authorize treating every person with a skin disease as guilty of the same sin.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?

No deeper study linked yet.