What is the context?
After capturing Gath, Hazael threatens Jerusalem. Joash sends sacred objects and gold from the temple and palace treasuries, and Hazael withdraws.
The account then records a conspiracy by Joash’s servants and his assassination. He is buried in the City of David, and his son Amaziah succeeds him. The earlier repair of the temple does not guarantee an untroubled end to his reign.
This chapter reports the political payment and the king’s violent death briefly. Its reference to other records should not be treated as a surviving source whose full contents have been independently examined.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley refers to 2 Chronicles 24:17–27, which gives a fuller account of Joash’s later abandonment of the Lord, his order to kill Zechariah son of Jehoiada, and the conspiracy linked to that bloodshed. That additional biblical account explains the warning in his end; it is not a detail explicitly narrated in this short Kings notice.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.