What is the context?
In the seventh year Jehoiada brings military commanders and guards into an oath-bound agreement and shows them the surviving king’s son. He arranges the Sabbath changes of duty so that the king and the temple will be guarded.
The commanders follow his instructions, receiving David’s spears and shields and surrounding the child. Jehoiada brings Joash out, crowns him, presents the Testimony, and has him anointed and proclaimed king.
The acclamation joins the restoration of a royal heir with the Lord’s house and the obligation signified by the Testimony. The safeguards and weapons belong to the particular succession crisis; they do not prescribe how a congregation should install its leaders.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley understands the Testimony as the book of the law given to remind the king of his duty. The USCCB note identifies it with the law’s tablets in a reconstructed installation ceremony. Both connect kingship with divine instruction, while differing about the precise object and manner. The BSB’s wording does not settle all those physical details.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.