What is the context?

Paul resumes his account of traveling. At Troas he found an open door for the gospel of Christ. Even so, he had no peace in his spirit because he did not find Titus there, and he left for Macedonia.

The reason Titus mattered becomes clearer in 2 Corinthians 7:5–9. His arrival brought comfort and news about the Corinthians’ response. Paul’s concern was bound up with people and their relationship, not simply a choice between places to preach.

These verses record an opportunity alongside unresolved concern. They do not call Paul’s departure a sin or turn the phrase open door into a rule that a worker must stay in one place regardless of other responsibilities.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Christians commonly understand Paul’s unrest as concern about Titus and the Corinthians, read together with the later account of their meeting. Wesley’s notes on verses 12–13 and the USCCB note on verses 12–13 both make that connection. The narrative itself does not give a complete rule for deciding between competing ministry needs.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?