What is the context?
The LORD raises up two adversaries against Solomon. Hadad is an Edomite prince who escaped to Egypt as a child during Joab’s campaign in Edom. Pharaoh provides for him, and he marries into the Egyptian royal household. After hearing that David and Joab have died, Hadad asks to return to his country.
Rezon has fled from Hadadezer king of Zobah, gathered a band of raiders and gained control in Damascus. His hostility adds to the trouble caused by Hadad.
The Hebrew word for adversary is satan, pronounced sah-TAHN. Brown–Driver–Briggs specifically lists these verses under its ordinary meaning of a personal or national opponent. The account is naming human enemies, whose histories reach back into David’s reign.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Henry and Gill understand the rise of these opponents as God’s correction of Solomon. Human conflicts become part of the consequences the LORD has announced.
Gill places their active opposition in the period following Solomon’s turn to idolatry, reading it alongside the earlier description of peace. The USCCB notes emphasize that the enemies’ histories go back to the beginning of his reign and question how complete that earlier picture of peace was.
The difference concerns the timing and extent of the opposition. In both readings, these accounts qualify the picture of an untroubled kingdom and show that Solomon’s power cannot keep every threat at bay.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.