What is the context?
Nathan warns Bathsheba that Adonijah has become king without David knowing. He urges her to act for her own safety and Solomon’s. She is to remind David of his oath that Solomon will succeed him; Nathan will come in and confirm her report.
Bathsheba follows that plan. She describes the feast and Solomon’s exclusion, and says Israel is looking to David to name his successor. If the matter is left unresolved, she fears that she and Solomon will be treated as criminals after David dies.
Nathan then arrives and asks whether David has authorized Adonijah’s rise. His report presses the same question: who is to sit on David’s throne? The king can no longer leave the issue unaddressed.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Gill points out that the earlier oath is confirmed by David himself in verse 30. Its absence from the preceding narrative does not mean Nathan and Bathsheba invent it.
The wider account also identifies Solomon as chosen to succeed David: 1 Chronicles 22:6–10 and 28:4–7 record David’s statements about God’s choice of Solomon.
Henry emphasizes David’s continuing responsibility even as his strength declines. Nathan and Bathsheba’s intervention brings a real danger before him and calls for action on the commitment he has already made.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.